Project: Partner Project
Role: Product Designer
Skills: User Research, Interaction Design, Prototyping
Tools: Figma, FigJam

Corner Jam

Corner Jam

Asynchronous preference collection that gives party leaders confidence and all members a voice, without requiring a discussion

Problem

Group planning for hangouts has a hidden imbalance: 1-2 "leaders" carry the decision-making burden while "followers" stay silent - even when they care about the outcome. Leaders feel pressure without input, followers want to contribute but not commit.


Solution

Corner Jam is a feature concept for Corner (a social discovery app). It collects preferences asynchronously via a <1 minute form, then surfaces "party scores" showing which spots match the group's taste.


Impact


Full group input (vs 20-30% in group chats)

Asynchronous preference form removes barriers to participation


<1 minute per person

6 inputs, no app download required


Eliminating the "down for anything" paradox

Followers contribute without the pressure of making decisions


Data-backed confidence for leaders

Party scores replace guesswork

Research

We interviewed 6 people (3 leaders, 3 followers) to better understand this dynamic and where it breaks down


People don't contribute, yet still critique the plans if they don't like them.

Emilio, leader


Leaders…

  • Initiate Plans

  • Feel pressure to "get it right"

  • Want everyone's input but don't always get it


I'd like to share some preferences. I'd rather not be the one who decides though.

Aurora, follower


Followers…

  • Have hidden preferences

  • Say "anything's fine" but care about the outcome

  • Don't want to make the final call, or have too much influence


How might we ensure that everyone’s preferences are represented fairly, regardless of their willingness or ability to voice them?

How Corner Jam Works

For Followers
  1. Receive a link (no app required)

  2. Pick a vibe from image tiles

  3. Set logistical preferences

  4. Submit (<1 minute total)

Only 6 visual inputs. Works on any browser, and no Corner account is required to participate.

For Leaders
  1. Tap the party icon on map

  2. Choose the category of activity

  3. Invite friends via app or share sheet

  4. Watch responses roll in

  5. Browse with party scores


Scores show group fit at a glance based on aggregated preferences from the form. Updates live as people respond.

Design Decisions

Asynchronous instead of a real-time interaction

Followers don't always contribute in group-chats. This isn't because they don't care; a real-time discussion is often more demanding than we'd like. Private, asynchronous contribution removes that social pressure.


Link-based with no barriers

Requiring that all participants are Corner users would add unnecessary friction. A web form means that anyone can participate in less than 60 seconds.


Visual inputs

Image tiles for vibe preferences are faster than reading options and better capture the emotional quality leaders told us they needed.


One button to start a party, and minimal UI changes

We reverse-engineered Corner's design language (without access to their design system) to make Corner Jam feel native.


Validation

Concept validation against research insights


Insight

Solution

Leaders want input but don't get it

Asynchronous form enables full group input

Followers have hidden preferences

Private form removes decision pressure

Decision burden isn't shared

Party scores shifts the process away from guesswork



If shipped, we'd measure:
  • % of invited followers who complete the form (target: >70%)

  • Time to complete form (target: <60 seconds)

  • Post-hangout satisfaction (did using Corner Jam lead to better outcomes?)

Reflection

Designing for user types rather than forcing one system on all users

The leader/follower dynamic is a natural part of our social personalities. We designed some structure into what was already happening, rather than trying to change the dynamic.


Research-driven design from initial interviews

Without user testing, we had to validate our design decisions through our initial interviews. Every decision tied directly back to those insights. Next time, I'd define specific benchmarks for success so we'd know if our assumptions were right.


Finding impact through small design changes

We added one button, one overlay, and one form. The best features feel like they were always there!